Volume Quantification of Acute Infratentorial Hemorrhage with Computed Tomography: Validation of the Formula 1/2ABC and 2/3SH

OBJECTIVE To compare the accuracy of formula 1/2ABC with 2/3SH on volume estimation for hypertensive infratentorial hematoma. METHODS One hundred and forty-seven CT scans diagnosed as hypertensive infratentorial hemorrhage were reviewed. Based on the shape, hematomas were categorized as regular or irregular. Multilobular was defined as a special shape of irregular. Hematoma volume was calculated employing computer-assisted volumetric analysis (CAVA), 1/2ABC and 2/3SH, respectively. RESULTS The correlation coefficients between 1/2ABC (or 2/3SH) and CAVA were greater than 0.900 in all subgroups. There were neither significant differences in absolute values of volume deviation nor percentage deviation between 1/2ABC and 2/3SH for regular hemorrhage (P>0.05). While for cerebellar, brainstem and irregular hemorrhages, the absolute values of volume deviation and percentage deviation by formula 1/2ABC were greater than 2/3SH (P<0.05). 1/2ABC and 2/3SH underestimated hematoma volume each by 10% and 5% for cerebellar hemorrhage, 14% and 9% for brainstem hemorrhage, 19% and 16% for regular hemorrhage, 9% and 3% for irregular hemorrhage, respectively. In addition, for the multilobular hemorrhage, 1/2ABC underestimated the volume by 9% while 2/3SH overestimated it by 2%. CONCLUSIONS For regular hemorrhage volume calculation, the accuracy of 2/3SH is similar to 1/2ABC. While for cerebellar, brainstem or irregular hemorrhages (including multilobular), 2/3SH is more accurate than 1/2ABC.